It’s Great Books Monday once again, and we are on pace to pass the 4,000-page mark this week. We’re also about to make John Locke’s acquaintance, as well as Voltaire’s.
Here are the readings for the upcoming week:
- The Iliad of Homer, Books XIII-XV (GBWW Vol. 3, pp. 148-189)
- “Camillus” by Plutarch (GBWW Vol. 13, pp. 102-121)
- Second Treatise on Civil Government by John Locke, Ch. I-IV (GBWW Vol. 33, pp. 25-30)
- Federalist #57 (GBWW Vol. 40, pp. 176-179; Antifederalist responses are here)
- “Beginnings and Endings”by Sir James Jeans (GGB Vol. 8, pp. 585-596; Chapter VII of The Universe Around Us)
- “The Philosophy of Common Sense” by Voltaire (GGB Vol. 10, pp. 453-474; excerpts from the Philosophical Dictionary including the following: Arts, Astrology, Authority, Authors, Concatenation of Events, Democracy, Equality, Friendship, Laws, Man (General Reflection On), Mountain, New Novelties, Reason, Self-Love, Socrates, Truth, Tyranny)
I’m unable to find an online copy of the Jeans piece (this seems to be happening more often with the scientific works), so I’ve linked to the Amazon.com page for the book. And apologies for the triple shot of the Enlightenment this week. I’m not sure how that happened, but there it is.
Here are some observations on last week’s readings:
- The Iliad of Homer, Books X-XII: I’ve been doing a lot of comparing of Homer with the Silmarillion this past week because Corey Olsen’s nine-month seminar on the latter wrapped up last Wednesday. We talked at some length about the epic voice in which the Silmarillion is composed and how modern readers wouldn’t find it so scary if they were more familiar with Homer, Dante et al. In this section of the Iliad, Agamemnon has a chance to shine, and so does Sarpedon, whose little speech about the duties of the aristocracy illustrates a key point of the “Homeric code.”
- “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift: It has been several years since I last read this, but it still creeps me out, even though I know it’s satire. I can only imagine the reaction people had when it was first published. And of course he claims to have gotten the idea of eating children from “an American of his acquaintance.” The conclusion is brilliant: “I’ve nothing to gain from this because I don’t have any kids to sell.”
- “Characters” by Jean de la Bruyère: According to Adler, this author would be considered in the top rank of essayists had he critiqued 17th-century institutions as much as he did individuals. If true, this just shows the modernist bias that punishes anyone who doesn’t genuflect sufficiently before the gods of democracy and secularization. I think these portraits are as skillful as anything I’ve seen coming from the pen of Montaigne.
- Federalist #55-56: That Madison and Hamilton felt it necessary to defend the idea of only one representative for every 30,000 people should give us second thoughts about our current ratio of one rep per 700,000+ people. I’m just sayin’ . . .
- “On Mathematical Method” by Alfred N. Whitehead: Some of the other selections in this volume have done a great job of explaining the significance of mathematics. This one effectively tells you what’s going on in the fundamentals of mathematics without getting bogged down in details. Note Whitehead’s classical education on display in the discussion of the Newton and the Greeks and Romans.
- “The Sentiment of Rationality” by William James: I don’t know what to think about this essay. I’m with James wholeheartedly in his critique of Clifford–I’m really glad we read Clifford several weeks ago so I knew what he was talking about–but this whole business about the subjective determining of reality is a bit scary. I love the pulling back of the curtain to expose the faith of the evolutionist; that part was cleverly done.
Although it has warmed up a bit here in Montgomery, the weather is still beautiful, if dry. I’m looking forward to fall and lots of outdoor reading.