Diomedes Against the Immortals

It’s Great Books Monday once again, and I hope you’re ready to wrap up two major works. We’ll have read one of them in its entirety and lengthy excerpts of the other.

Here are the readings for the upcoming week:

  1. The Iliad of Homer, Books VII-IX  (GBWW Vol. 3, pp. 77-111)
  2. Of Experience” by Michel de Montaigne (GBWW Vol. 23, pp. 559-587)
  3. Plato’s Republic, Book X (GBWW Vol. 6, pp. 427-441)
  4. Federalist #54 (GBWW Vol. 40, pp. 170-172; Antifederalist responses are here)
  5. On a Piece of Chalk“by Thomas H. Huxley (GGB Vol. 8, pp. 205-222)
  6. How We Think by John Dewey, Chapter XIX (GGB Vol. 10, pp. 205-213)

If you’ve gotten comfortable with short essays from Bacon and Montaigne, brace yourself; “Of Experience” is really long.

Here are some observations on last week’s readings:

  1. Diomedes Wounding Aphrodite

    The Iliad of Homer, Books IV-VI: For someone who’s not key to the central plot of the Iliad, Diomedes is one impressive fellow. In this reading he not only mows down several Trojan heroes and severely wounds Aeneas, but he also injures two immortals. Hector is no slouch, either, and we see a tender moment tinged with fatalism in his conversation with his wife. Paris, by contrast, fails to inspire.

  2. “Of Youth and Age” by Francis Bacon: I like the urging of cooperation between the young and old so that all can benefit from the strengths of each. Lots more classical references here (three Latin quotations) and even a rabbinic commentary on an Old Testament text. How could this man ever have succumbed to empiricism?
  3. Plato’s Republic, Book IX: So we finally work our way back to issues raised at the beginning of this work. Socrates argues that it’s best to be just even if no one else knows or gives you credit because that is the best thing for your own soul. I don’t really know how persuasive this line of argument would be in a pre-Christian context, although Plato’s yes-men nod enthusiastically whenever Socrates says something.
  4. Federalist #52-53: Much of the attention here is on defending biennial elections for the House of Representatives as opposed to some other interval. In the abstract, annual elections might seem best with the benefits of modern transportation and communication, but then that would subject us to year-round campaigning. Ugh.
  5. “Mathematical Creation” by Henri Poincaré: I was ready to read something technical here, but this piece is really more of an exploration of the psychology of invention. I found this pre-Freudian attempt to account for new ideas striking like a bolt from the blue very interesting. Of course there’s no concession to the possibility of inspiration here.
  6. How We Think by John Dewey, Chapter XV-XVII: I guess it’s a mark of Dewey’s influence over the last century that most of the positions here seem pretty obvious to modern readers. That students shouldn’t be given busy work seems self-evident, although apparently many teachers still do it. The endorsement of the expansion of one’s vocabulary was welcome.

If you’re not working this Labor Day, I hope the weather outside is nice for you. We’re getting rain from Tropical Storm Lee where I live, but I’ll most likely be in the office.

Advertisements

About Dr. J

I am Professor of Humanities at Faulkner University, where I chair the Department of Humanities and direct online M.A. and Ph.D. programs based on the Great Books of Western Civilization. I am also Associate Editor of the Journal of Faith and the Academy and a member of the faculty at Liberty Classroom.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Diomedes Against the Immortals

  1. Beth says:

    re the Iliad: With Athena aiding him, Diomedes is indeed a warrior to be reckoned with, but he also make a great foil (is that the right term) for exposing the real nature and character of the various gods. Considering that Jupiter is the “king of the gods”, he doesn’t seem very kingly. He does not lead effectively, is forever changing his mind, and seems to side with whoever happens to be standing in front of him at the time. I find it interesting to compare this with the description of the God of the Bible, unchanging and ever just.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s